Sunday, June 2, 2013

Ban Flouride Legislations

This first bill is from http://fluoridefreekansas.org/

Activism Truth is dedicated to finding model legislation that can help stop corruption in government and toxins in our environment. The Fluoride added to town water is chemical plant toxic waste that is not natural and harmless like the fluoride in limestone.

The American Dental Association is a corrupt institution that profits more based on the more cavities you get. Our whole medical system is flawed and the added Fluoride actually causes brain damage to your pineal gland.

Here are some great resources on the subject.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/

“[T]he political profluoridation stance has evolved into a dogmatic, authoritarian, essentially antiscientific posture, one that discourages open debate of scientific issues.” - Dr. Edward Groth, Senior Scientist, Consumers Union, 1991.
“Journal editors often have refused for political reasons to publish information that raises questions about fluoridation.” - Chemical & Engineering News, August 1, 1988.
“We are left with compelling evidence that powerful interests with high financial stakes have colluded to prematurely close honest discussion and investigation into fluoride toxicity.” - Dr. Sheldon Krimsky, Tufts University, August 16, 2004.
“The Public Health Service, unfortunately, has locked itself into a position where it has made this statement on the record that there is absolutely no hazard to fluoridating public water supplies and the matter is closed. Now, that, of course, is immediately an unscientific approach.” - Ralph Nader, Consumer Advocate, 1971.

Here is the bill. If you want to see this on your ballot so people can vote on stopping fluoride directly, link up with Activism Truth. We will help put together an action plan for you in your state.

WHEREAS water, our most precious resource, is essential to all and the public water supply should be safe for all to drink; and

WHEREAS fluoridated water provides an uncontrolled dose of fluoride to citizens, some of whom may drink significantly large quantities due to their occupation, outdoor activity, special diet, health conditions (such as diabetes mellitus and diabetes insipidus), or medications being taken, and

WHEREAS fluoride is the only substance added to public water for the purpose of treating and preventing a health condition in the body, rather than treating the water itself (such as chlorine being added to kill microorganisms), and many citizens may feel it is not morally or ethically justifiable to dose citizens with this substance or any other forced medication in water without first obtaining their written informed consent, and

WHEREAS the National Research Council in 2006 reported that American infants and young children are being exposed, on a body weight basis, to 3-4 times the amount of fluoride as are adults, and young children’s bodies are especially susceptible to harm from chemical exposures due to their rapidly growing cells and tissues, and

WHEREAS as recent as November 9, 2006 the American Dental Association (ADA) raised concern that parents and caregivers of infants under 1 year of age may wish to use non-fluoridated water when mixing infant milk formula for their babies, and

WHEREAS alternative methods of delivery exist; and we are already over exposed to fluoride in foods and beverages. and

WHEREAS each individual possesses the inalienable right to choose or reject what he or she consumes; therefore

We the undersigned citizens of Kansas respectfully demand that city and state leaders REJECT any considerations for using our public water supply to deliver any product, substance, element or medicine for the purpose of affecting the physical or mental functions of the body of any person consuming such water, and also ask said leaders to REJECT any such initiatives by fluoride proponents.

One other bill I found was from the Green Party in Canada, both of these could be easily adopted for use in any city or state in the USA that has the ballot initiative process. More info on this process can be found at http://www.activismtruth.com

 http://www.greenparty.ca/motion/g10-p19

Ban on artificial water fluoridation products

Ban on artificial water fluoridation products

Code: 
G10-p19
Status: 
Adopted
Subcategory: 
Health and Environment
Submitter: 
Claudia Rodriguez-Larrain 
 
Summary: 
This motion, in calling for a ban on the fluoridation of public drinking water, would create a new policy and would involve the federal government stepping into an area that has traditionally been within the jurisdiction of the provinces.
Motion Preamble: 
WHEREAS fluoridation products such as hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride are toxic by-products scrubbed from the smokestacks of the phosphate mining industry, and less than one percent of treated water is actually ingested by people and the remaining 99 percent is discharged into the environment;
WHEREAS fluoride is not removed in sewage treatment and remains a toxic constituent of the effluent discharged by treatment plants to rivers and lakes, and background levels of fluoride in the Great Lakes exceed the Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG) for aquatic species, and fluoride concentrations in sewage effluent are 5-10 times in excess of the CWQG. At these concentrations fluoride is known to be toxic to a variety of water species such as salmon, caddisfly, daphnia & others;
WHEREAS the use of drinking water to deliver medications is not medically or environmentally sustainable, and the use of unregulated, unapproved medications in drinking water, without a prescription or informed consent is medically and environmentally not sustainable, and the daily dose of fluoride cannot be controlled and health effects from fluoride are not monitored;
WHEREAS 97 percent of Europe does not use artificial water fluoridation products in their public drinking water supply, and 94 percent of the world's population does not use artificial water fluoridation products in their public water supply;
WHEREAS no statistical difference exists in rates of dental caries between areas that use artificial water fluoridation chemicals and those that do not (Statistics Canada);
WHEREAS the Green Party affirms that the precautionary principle should be used where there is evidence of potential harm in the absence of complete scientific consensus.
Motion Operative: 
BE IT RESOLVED that the Green Party seeks to introduce and support legislation that will ban artificial fluoridation products in public drinking water.
Sponsor(s): 
Toronto Danforth EDA, Davenport EDA, Vaughan EDA, York University Greens, Frank De Jong, Tom Eric, Halvorsen Jobi, Mike Kenny, Claudia Rodriguez-Larrain, Ingrid Sheriff, Constantine Kritsonis, Mike Dewar, Marie La Plume, Fay Neuber, Stefan Premdas, Bruce Hearns, Matt Turner